5. Outsourcing vs. In-house development, which is better and practical?

        For me, outsourcing is more practical because we can save money, time and effort. It’s the best choice to the country or people that can afford to it. For example in US, most American that engages in business and different transactions don’t have time to encode their papers. They are going to outsource the job because they could save their time, money and effort. They will be saving time because instead they are going to type or do the task they outsource it so that someone will to the task for them. Most businessmen in America don’t have time to type because time is money for them. They can do more transactions if the task is lesser. They can save money because they are not going to pay to a standard salary of an American. They will not hire an encoder to do the task. The standard salary in America is big so they can’t afford to waste or lose money. They can save their effort because instead of doing the task they can focus on their main job.

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://dohnne.blogsome.com/2007/05/12/5outsourcing-vs-in-house-development-which-is-better-and-practical/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.